LoL JUNGLE Discussion

Yess, I agree with Branko, Jarvan and Diana are so good junglers with shields.
For example, Warwick is good, because he have llifs. in passive and in Q.

 

Agree. Sejuani, Skarner and Amumu were good junglers, but now they need lot of reccals...

 

Agree. Sejuani, Skarner and Amumu were good junglers, but now they need lot of reccals...

 

Lee Sin, J4, Diana, WW they are al good junglers, they all have shield/lifesteal

 

Lee Sin, J4, Diana, WW they are al good junglers, they all have shield/lifesteal

 

i agree with u

 

i agree with u

 

it just about the team not just jungle ...
they are 5 important roles in game ... when one fail the game could be lost ...

 

it just about the team not just jungle ...
they are 5 important roles in game ... when one fail the game could be lost ...

 

the new champion is really strong in the jungle ...
next cool jungler ... in league

 

the new champion is really strong in the jungle ...
next cool jungler ... in league

 

Yes but,life steal scale more in the early then sheilds.Sheild are more for being durable in team fights

 

Yes but,life steal scale more in the early then sheilds.Sheild are more for being durable in team fights

 

Bot Lane Taking Level 1 Jungle feat. SMITE

With the introduction of Preseason 5 jungle, most of junglers felt uncomfortable starting without a leash. However, now that everyone is gettin the jist of things, bot is starting to take Gromp and/or Golems at level 1 more and more now rather than provide a leash. I mean as long as the jungler is okay with it and is either a high sustain jungler or starting at red buff, it seems like a decent strategy.
Pros:
-Instant level 2 for ADC, don't need to fight for level advantage in lane early on
Reduces inlane danger of being caught or cheesed by level up or bush camping
Cons:
-Can get ganked at the camp once enemy team doesn't see you in lane
-Reduced health if done improperly
-No leash for jungler if they start on the same side as you.

Challenging Smite:
Smite can target enemy champions, marking them for 6 seconds. Marked enemies are revealed (does not reveal stealth) take (15 +3x level) bonus TD from you onhit and deal 20% reduced damage to you.

Pros:
-Red side lets you start with smiting Gromp, which deals damage to enemies who attack you (good vs harass lanes)
-Decent smite bonus that scales well into late game (20% DR is no joke)
Cons:
-No impact on saving your support (in comparison to heal)
-Weak before you finish your jungle item;
-Slow to pick up jungle item unless you don't start Doran's Blade
-Takes away jungler's farm.

Conclusion
I think that if you are starting on red side then taking smite is on your AD carry is a decent strategy, as the jungle item does scale decently into late game and red side gives you Gromp to start. However, make sure it's okay with your jungler first as most probably won't take kindly to an AD carry stealing their farm.



Opinions??

 

Bot Lane Taking Level 1 Jungle feat. SMITE

With the introduction of Preseason 5 jungle, most of junglers felt uncomfortable starting without a leash. However, now that everyone is gettin the jist of things, bot is starting to take Gromp and/or Golems at level 1 more and more now rather than provide a leash. I mean as long as the jungler is okay with it and is either a high sustain jungler or starting at red buff, it seems like a decent strategy.
Pros:
-Instant level 2 for ADC, don't need to fight for level advantage in lane early on
Reduces inlane danger of being caught or cheesed by level up or bush camping
Cons:
-Can get ganked at the camp once enemy team doesn't see you in lane
-Reduced health if done improperly
-No leash for jungler if they start on the same side as you.

Challenging Smite:
Smite can target enemy champions, marking them for 6 seconds. Marked enemies are revealed (does not reveal stealth) take (15 +3x level) bonus TD from you onhit and deal 20% reduced damage to you.

Pros:
-Red side lets you start with smiting Gromp, which deals damage to enemies who attack you (good vs harass lanes)
-Decent smite bonus that scales well into late game (20% DR is no joke)
Cons:
-No impact on saving your support (in comparison to heal)
-Weak before you finish your jungle item;
-Slow to pick up jungle item unless you don't start Doran's Blade
-Takes away jungler's farm.

Conclusion
I think that if you are starting on red side then taking smite is on your AD carry is a decent strategy, as the jungle item does scale decently into late game and red side gives you Gromp to start. However, make sure it's okay with your jungler first as most probably won't take kindly to an AD carry stealing their farm.



Opinions??

 

It's not harder, it's different. The hard part is your psychology.

 

It's not harder, it's different. The hard part is your psychology.

 

When i play sustain support like sona or soraka, i always do camp clear for lvl 2, and its not risky at all, i never seen that enemy even try to counter it, but its good to place ward just in case, u dont even need smite. And if u have sustain support ur always full AP. Btw there is special spot when u do golems that they almost dont attack you.
I presented SMITE strategy long time ago, even i never seen that ppl play it, i still think that ist rly good, especialy that u will have 2 smites for baron/dragon, or to smite parrots for "extra oracle"

 

When i play sustain support like sona or soraka, i always do camp clear for lvl 2, and its not risky at all, i never seen that enemy even try to counter it, but its good to place ward just in case, u dont even need smite. And if u have sustain support ur always full AP. Btw there is special spot when u do golems that they almost dont attack you.
I presented SMITE strategy long time ago, even i never seen that ppl play it, i still think that ist rly good, especialy that u will have 2 smites for baron/dragon, or to smite parrots for "extra oracle"

 

After these last updates Warwick is so strong in jungle, he is unstopable.
Sometimes when I play with a friend he takes Volibear for top lane and I prefer to go Udyr jungle because of that combination his Q and mine E.