|
Post Date: 22:30 05-06-2010
Rating: 4
Author: TSamee
Comment: Fine, as an RPG, I'll give it massive props. Getting loot is ridiculously addictive, and there's enough content to keep you busy for days. But let's remember that we're voting for the best SHOOTER here, and that's the part the Borderlands doesn't get quite right.
Colision detection on snipers is dodgy at long range, even with the most accurate guns, and the game honestly feels too much like a Halo clone with iron-sights in terms of its shooting, with jumping around the enemy with a shotgun being the order of the day
While the sheer number of guns is awe-inspiring, the fact of the matter is that, after a while, all the different types feel the same. There're a handful of fairly generic weapon frames, and every gun (even the uniques) is put into one of these before having a whole load of variables changed, from its stock and optics to its elemental damage. It just feels too formulaic, and as a result you can't help but feel that, after firing maybe five guns of each type, that you've shot them all.
True, anything else that claims to be a true modern RPG-Shooter pales in comparison to Borderlands. I feel that Deus Ex was better, but it's too outdated (and no, this isn't nostalgia speaking; I played Deus Ex for the first time two weeks ago). But, frankly, there're better shooters than Borderlands (Team Fortress 2, Left 4 Dead 2, Modern Warfare 2, Bad Company 2), and there're better RPGs (Oblivion, Fallout 3, Dragon Age, Mass Effect, etc.), and that's why I don't think it deserves the top spot in either of the two categories. It's damn good at both of the things it tries to do. It's just nowhere near as good as the big boys in either league.
|